Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Anna Leon-Guerrero's 2nd Edition of Social Problems

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Media, Culture & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCourt, T.
Right arrow Articles by Burkart, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

When Creators, Corporations and Consumers Collide: Napster and the Development of On-line Music Distribution

Tom McCourt

Fordham University, New York, NY, USA mccourt{at}fordham.edu

Patrick Burkart

Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA patrick{at}burkart.org

The Internet is often depicted as the ultimate arena for unfettered capitalism, erasing geographic boundaries and barriers to entry while providing a plethora of goods and services to consumers. This article traces how public and private reactions by the five major record companies to new Internet distribution technologies have undermined this popular myth. We use a political economic approach to examine the case of A&M Records et al. v. Napster, and discuss how this case underscores the importance of controlling the Internet as an entertainment distribution pipeline. Expressed concerns about piracy mask the actual intentions of the `Big Five' - control of all modes of distribution. The strength of the Big Five's cartel has a momentum of its own based in its market oligopoly, which has been secured through its ownership and management of intellectual property; through format changes and setting standards for other technologies; and through lobbying and legal activities.

Key Words: digital rights management • Digital Millennium Copyright Act • MP3 • Napster • peer-to-peer • RIAA • SDMI

Media, Culture & Society, Vol. 25, No. 3, 333-350 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0163443703025003003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
B. Klein
`The new radio': music licensing as a response to industry woe
Media Culture Society, July 1, 2008; 30(4): 463 - 478.
[PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
J. Sterne
The mp3 as cultural artifact
New Media Society, October 1, 2006; 8(5): 825 - 842.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
M. Yar
The global 'epidemic' of movie 'piracy': crime-wave or social construction?
Media Culture Society, September 1, 2005; 27(5): 677 - 696.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
A. Leyshon, P. Webb, S. French, N. Thrift, and L. Crewe
On the reproduction of the musical economy after the Internet
Media Culture Society, March 1, 2005; 27(2): 177 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]