Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Media, Culture & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antcliff, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Broadcasting in the 1990s: competition, choice and inequality?

Valerie Antcliff

University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK, vaantcliff{at}uclan.ac.uk

Restructuring of the UK television industry has resulted in a shift from secure, long-term employment to casualized, project-based working, with the period prior to restructuring typically described as one of structured careers and stable employement. The article draws on documentary evidence to suggest that, for women, it was a period of widespread discrimination and gendered occupational segregation. While legislation and equal opportunity initiatives from the mid-1970s onwards made some progress in remedying the situation, fragmentation and informal working practices were welcomed by many women as an opportunity to gain control over the organization of their working lives. Yet project-based employment has allowed individual producers discretion in the organization of work, and placed the industry at odds with theories of equal opportunities that emphasize the need for centralized policies and administration. The article concludes by drawing on a series of interviews to suggest that many issues addressed by earlier equal opportunity initiatives have re-emerged in the context of short-term contracting.

Key Words: employment • equal opportunities • recruitment • television industry • women in television

Media, Culture & Society, Vol. 27, No. 6, 841-859 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0163443705057673


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
J. Holgate and S. McKay
Equal opportunities policies: how effective are they in increasing diversity in the audio-visual industries' freelance labour market?
Media Culture Society, January 1, 2009; 31(1): 151 - 163.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Communication InquiryHome page
K. K. Halone
The Structuration of Racialized Sport Organizing
Journal of Communication Inquiry, January 1, 2008; 32(1): 22 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
V. Antcliff, R. Saundry, and M. Stuart
Networks and social capital in the UK television industry: The weakness of weak ties
Human Relations, February 1, 2007; 60(2): 371 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]