Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Media, Culture & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘Chinese Party Publicity Inc.’ conglomerated: the case of the Shenzhen Press Group

Chin-Chuan Lee

Zhou He

City University of Hong Kong

Yu Huang

Hong Kong Baptist University

The Chinese press, instead of acting purely as a state propaganda instrument, now functions as ‘Party Publicity Inc.’ – that is, a quasi-business that seeks to make huge profits on the one hand and to legitimate the Party mandate by promoting its image on the other. The accelerated pace of media conglomeration following China's accession to the World Trade Organization has sharpened this trend. This study examines the impact of press ecology in Shenzhen, a national trend-setter for ‘Party Publicity Inc.’, before and after conglomeration. We observe that press conglomeration has (a) engendered a more centralized management structure and operation; (b) replaced duopolistic competition with market monopoly and greater price-fixing abilities; (c) continued to rely on state office subscription; (d) dampened journalists’ enthusiasm for political reform in favor of economic interest; (e) developed a two-tier Publicity Inc. to serve both the Party and the market; and (f) provided an opportunity for overseas expansion. Marketization does not trigger political reform, but pre-empts pressure for political change. The Party Publicity Inc. in its conglomerate form represents a complicitous accommodation between power and money engineered by a post-Communist bureaucratic-authoritarian regime.

Key Words: bureaucratic-authoritarian state capitalism • globalization • media conglomeration • market-driven journalism • media in post-Communist China • party-state propaganda • Party Publicity Inc. • political economy

Media, Culture & Society, Vol. 28, No. 4, 581-602 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0163443706065031


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
Yong Cao and J. D.H. Downing
The realities of virtual play: video games and their industry in China
Media Culture Society, July 1, 2008; 30(4): 515 - 529.
[PDF]


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
C.-C. Lee, Zhou He, and Yu Huang
Party-Market Corporatism, Clientelism, and Media in Shanghai
International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2007; 12(3): 21 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]